When Christian unbelievers in the existence of the word of God want to spread their hypocritical belief, they often use science. Let’s look at how they “prove” the Bible is not the word of God:

Le 11:6 And the hare, because he cheweth the cud, but divideth not the hoof; he is unclean unto you.

For many generations scholars howled with laughter at this verse because modern man knew rabbits don’t chew their cud – they don’t even have a cud! Believers sat in grim-faced stony silence, faithfully trusting, hoping the word of God was somehow correct. If you read an older (fifteen or twenty years) book on raising rabbits, it will tell you to clean out their cages frequently in order to prevent the disgusting creatures from eating their own shitballs. Newer books, however, will tell you man has now discovered that rabbits chew their cud. They don’t regurgitate it like cows, sheep, and goats; they poop it in soft, egg-shaped masses. Remembering where they deposited them, rabbits return later, consume the nutritious nodules again, and then deposit the true waste as the smaller, rounder, harder pellets that Bible-rejecting assholes no longer bring up as “proof”! What a Book!

So the next time you see a pile of rabbit shit, laugh and tell your family it’s a fitting monument to unbelief; it’s not wisdom from a dumb ass (2 Pe 2:16), it’s wisdom from a hare’s ass.

(Above excerpt from The Age of Reason, Chapter D22.)

There are three types of Christian students of the Bible:

1.     Pure theologian: This man is a true believer in “science falsely so called: which some professing have erred concerning the faith” (1 Tim 6:20). For him, the more books the better. When he reads in the Bible that rabbits chew their cud, and that Christ was born of a virgin, and then he reads in scientific texts that rabbits most certainly do not chew their cuds, and that no virgin can conceive, he simply goes along with worldly wisdom and declares the word of God to be incorrect. He is a Bible rejecter who boldly worships the worldly findings and theories of science. And because a few theologians are so convinced that theology is superior to the Bible, these red-faced diehards still cling desperately to the discredited cud “error”! How do they do that? They say there seem to be some differences between cow cuds and rabbit cuds, and differences in the way cows and rabbits chew those cuds, and differences in which end of cows and rabbits their cuds come out of, and since some of those differences contradict the narrow definitions in now-out-of-date “scientific” manuals…God’s Book still has it ass-backwards!

2.    Hypocritical theologian: This man is usually an evangelical or a fundamentalist who is weak in the faith. He wants to appear smart so he can be respected by man, but he also wants to be held in esteem by his denomination. So when he reads in scientific texts that rabbits don’t chew their cuds and virgins don’t have children, he compromises by rejecting what the Bible says about rabbits, but then hypocritically accepts what his denomination says about Christ’s virgin birth. His pious act gives him “a form of godliness, but denying the power thereof: from such turn away” because he is “ever learning, and never able to come to the knowledge of the truth” (2 Tim 3). In the final analysis he, too, is a Bible rejecter because his beliefs are formed by a timid mixture of science and denominational tradition.

3.     Bible believer: This man is aware of what science says. And he, too, feels the pressure of ego and vanity to appear smart by going along – to some degree – with science and religious traditions when they contradict what God says. But his selfless love for Christ gives him the strength and discipline to reject theology’s worldly wisdom and to live by faith – to live “by every word that proceedeth out of the mouth of God” (Mat 4:4).

Note: One of these wallpapers is entitled “Bible Believers’ Delight” and it includes a verse that says God will derisively laugh at Bible rejecters. “Bible Believers’ Delight” merely follows God’s lead: Because Leviticus 11:6’s “rabbit cud” was used for so long by those who wanted to “correct” and “discredit” the written word of God, and because rabbit cud has turned out to be such a huge and down-to-earth embarrassment for theologians, Bible believers now take exceptional delight in the verse because it underscores – rather crudely but effectively – the fact that Bible-rejecting theologians who love to “correct” the written word of God (anyone who scrounges through Greek and Hebrew dictionaries is a theologian who rejects the modern existence of the inspired, inerrant written word of God) are full of rabbit cud! You Bible-believing comrades will therefore enjoy seeing rabbit cud (and Balaam’s talking ass) appearing on several wallpapers on other pages. I say again, you’ll find no large-ear ticklers or padded pews at this web site – it’s for Bible-believing warriors who by faith consult not with flesh and blood via theology…but rather trust in the Holy Spirit to help them during Bible study.